
Pigeon Forge Log Cabin Market Report: July 2026
August 2026 edition: July 2026 closed cabin sales compared with June 2026.
Pigeon Forge closed 15 log cabin sales in July, one more than June. The median sold price moved up to $925,000 from $612,500, average marketing time improved, and the average sale-to-list ratio also strengthened.
July’s closed-sale set was a little larger than June’s and it leaned more heavily toward higher-priced cabins, which pushed the median up. The average marketing time improved to 85 days from 116.9 days, and the average sale-to-list ratio rose to 97.4% from 91.0%. That mix change matters: it shows where the closed sales landed in July, not a guarantee that every cabin increased in value.
Pigeon Forge Cabin Market: July 2026 vs. June 2026
Closed sales reflect completed transactions. Monthly median prices can change as the mix of cabin sizes, locations and amenities changes.
- Closed cabin sales 15
- Median sold price $925,000
- Total closed-sale volume $13,061,900
- Average days on market 85 days
- Average sale-to-asking price 97.4%
Pigeon Forge Cabins Sold in July 2026
Recent completed cabin sales, shown with their recorded closing prices.
- 264 Moose Ridge Way, Pigeon ForgeSold $358,500
This one-bedroom log cabin closed at $358,500, just under the $359,000 asking price. It recorded 26 days on market, a shorter marketing period than the July average.
- 260 Moose Ridge Way, Pigeon ForgeSold $369,400
This adjacent one-bedroom log cabin closed at $369,400, slightly above the $369,000 asking price. It recorded 26 days on market, also shorter than the July average.
- 4610 High Vista Way, Pigeon ForgeSold $980,000
This larger log cabin closed at $980,000 after 135 days on market and finished below its $1,049,900 asking price. The sale shows a longer marketing period than the month’s overall average.
- 3738 Heritage Hills Drive, Pigeon ForgeSold $935,000
This 4-bedroom log cabin closed at $935,000, below its $950,000 asking price, after 44 days on market. It was one of the shorter marketing times among the higher-priced closings.
- 3750 Heritage Hills Drive, Pigeon ForgeSold $925,000
This 4-bedroom log cabin closed at $925,000, just under the $974,999 asking price, after 97 days on market. It matched the month’s median sold price.
- 839 W Gold Dust Drive, Pigeon ForgeSold $525,000
This 3-bedroom cabin closed at $525,000, below its $536,400 asking price, after 99 days on market. Its price point sits well below the month’s median and helps show the spread in July’s closed mix.
- 3805 Twilight Way, Pigeon ForgeSold $1,100,000
This 4-bedroom cabin closed at $1,100,000, below its $1,194,500 asking price, after 119 days on market. The listing remarks included a reported revenue claim of $145,000, which is unverified.
- 444 Hatchet Way, Pigeon ForgeSold $1,300,000
This 4-bedroom cabin closed at full asking price of $1,300,000 after 168 days on market. It was one of the longest marketing times in the month’s closed sales.
- 419 Stone Ridge Way, Pigeon ForgeSold $799,000
This 3-bedroom cabin closed at full asking price of $799,000 after 98 days on market. It landed near the middle of the month’s pricing range.
- 410 Southern Sun Way, Pigeon ForgeSold $1,025,000
This 4-bedroom cabin closed at $1,025,000, below its $1,050,000 asking price, after 67 days on market. The listing remarks included a reported gross income figure around $150,000, which is unverified.
- 2906 Tipi Way, Pigeon ForgeSold $1,850,000
This 6-bedroom cabin closed at $1,850,000, below its $2,000,000 asking price, after 69 days on market. It was the highest-priced closing in July.
- 304 City View Way Unit 1, Pigeon ForgeSold $895,000
This 4-bedroom cabin closed at $895,000, just below its $899,900 asking price, after 29 days on market. The listing remarks included reported rental revenue of $88,500 in 2025 and $50,000 so far in 2026, both unverified.
When the closed sales skew higher, the median can jump fast even if each individual cabin did not move the same way.
What stands out to me is the combination of a higher median closed price and a better sale-to-list ratio. That may suggest buyers were still willing to pay for cabins that matched what they wanted, but the month also shows a wide spread in outcomes, so pricing still has to respect condition, layout, and location. If you are selling, the market appears to reward cabins that are ready to compete on presentation and pricing; if you are buying, there can still be meaningful differences from one cabin to the next, even within the same city and price band.
Pigeon Forge Monthly Cabin Market FAQ
Did Pigeon Forge close more log cabin sales in July than in June?
Yes. July closed 15 sales compared with 14 in June, a gain of one closed sale. That is a modest increase, but it still gives a cleaner picture of a slightly busier closing month.
Why did the median sold price rise so sharply?
The median moved from $612,500 in June to $925,000 in July. That does not mean every cabin appreciated by that amount; it suggests the mix of closed sales shifted toward higher-priced cabins in July.
Were cabins selling faster in July?
Yes, on average. The average marketing time fell to 85 days from 116.9 days in June, which means July’s closings spent less time on the market before going under contract and closing.
How should I read the sale-to-list ratio change?
The average sale-to-list ratio improved from 91.0% in June to 97.4% in July. That means July’s closed sales, on average, ended closer to the recorded asking price than June’s did, but each cabin still needs to be judged on its own numbers.
What matters most if I am pricing a cabin in this market?
The July data suggests pricing still has to be matched to the cabin’s size, condition, and position in the market. A cabin that is overreaching may sit longer, while one that lines up well with nearby sold cabins may move more efficiently.
This August 2026 edition covers completed cabin sales through July 31, 2026. Information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed; confirm property details, rental permissions and financial statements with Matt before making a decision.

